Works and Prayers of a Fils Prodigue


“Never Thinking”
November 20, 2009, 1:17 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

From Man the Unknown by Alexis Carrel:

It is evident that men have joyfully welcomed modern civilization. They have abandoned the countryside and flocked to the cities and the factories. They eagerly adopt the mode of life and the ways of acting and of thinking of the new era. They lay aside their old habits without hesitation, because these habits demand a greater effort. It is less fatiguing to work in a factory or an office than on a farm. But even in the country, new techniques have relieved the harshness of existence. Modern houses make life easier for everybody. By their comfort, their warmth, and their pleasant lighting, they give their inmates a feeling of rest and contentment. Their up-to-date appointments considerably decrease the labor that, in bygone days, housekeeping demanded from women. Besides the lessening of muscular effort and the possession of comfort, human beings have accepted cheerfully the privilege of never being alone, of enjoying the innumerable distractions of the city, of living among huge crowds, of never thinking. They also appreciate being released, through a purely intellectual education, from the moral restraint imposed upon them by Puritan discipline and religious principles. In truth, modern life has set them free. It incites them to acquire wealth by any and every possible means, provided that these means do not lead them to jail. It opens to them all the countries of the earth. It has liberated them from all superstitions. It allows them the frequent excitation and the easy satisfaction of their sexual appetites. It does away with constraint, discipline, effort, everything that is inconvenient and laborious. The people, especially those belonging to the lower classes, are happier from a material standpoint than in former times. However, some of them progressively cease to appreciate the distractions and the vulgar pleasures of modern life. Occasionally, their health does not permit them to continue indefinitely the alimentary, alcoholic, and sexual excesses to which they are led by the suppression of all discipline. Besides, they are haunted by the fear of losing their employment, their means of subsistence, their savings, their fortune. They are unable to satisfy the need for security that exists in the depth of each of us. In spite of social insurances, they feel uneasy about their future. Those who are capable of thinking become discontented.

Worth the read. Available here: http://www.soilandhealth.org/03sov/0303critic/030310carrel/Carrel-ch1.htm



The Mortification More Explained
November 9, 2009, 3:46 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

I intimated in my last post about my difficulies with the “mortification of desire” which St. John of the Cross speaks about. I trudged through the first book of The Ascent of Mount Carmel enthused but hesitant; convinced but confused. “How could I mortify all desire except the desire for God? Is that even possible?” “How do we enjoy the pleasures of the world which God has given us with detachment?” And so forth. I knew that his thesis was only the explication of the first commandment, and yet I was in darkness as to what the extent of the solution required.

I am pleased to say that John of the Cross deigned to explain himself further towards the end of Book I, just as any seasoned teacher gives his lecture and, scanning his class and seeing scrunching brows, perfectly anticipates their inquiries. John of the Cross learned such a method from the best scholastic scholars, who in their writings always anticipated the disputational dialogue of the listener. And so, after spending much time describing, with the Scriptures, the damage of desire — how it weakens, torments, defiles, darkens, and blinds the soul — John of the Cross looks up to his class and says “I see you’re having a problem; let me explain.” And so we ask:

1. “Are all desires equally harmful to the soul? It seems rather severe to think that we should mortify our entire will and all our affections!” No, not all desires are equally harmful to the soul. Being men, we are beset with natural desires not involving the use of will (I assume the Holy Doctor means desires to eat, sleep, breathe, drink, i.e. those concerned chiefly with the maintenance of the body and mind which are mandatory and desired without being willed — still, he does not specify beyond calling them “natural desires”). These cause no harm to the soul and are, as it were, nearly impossible to conquer in this life (and how evidently so!).

2. “What, then, are the desires which we should mortify?” While natural desires and in some cases involuntary imperfections do not present a great obstacle to Divine Union, it is the desires of the will itself which must be moritifed. Thus, the soul must desire only the will of God, and as such, “it must not intentionally and knowingly consent with the will to imperfections.” It must desire only what God desires, and must mortify these habitual imperfections which it knowingly chooses, and most especially voluntary venial sins and — it almost needn’t be said — the grave evil of mortal sin, which entirely blinds and darkens the soul. The soul, as it were, must remain detached from all things, being entirely “in Christ,” whose very meat and drink was the Will of God, and must not be attached to any creature for its own sake. In order to achieve this, though, the soul must not allow any imperfection or stain to remain, as John of the Cross emphatically points out:

For even as a log of wood may fail to be transformed in the fire because a single degree of heat is wanting to it, even so the soul will not be transformed in God if it have but one imperfection, although it be something less than voluntary desire; for, as we shall say hereafter concerning the night of faith, the soul has only one will, and that will, if it be embarassed [that is, made impure] by aught and set upon aught, is not free, solitary and pure, as is necessary for Divine transformation (52).

This will have to suffice for this issue — although perhaps I will post another entry concerning St. John of the Cross’s distinction between Privative and Positive Evil as it relates to desires, and how imperfections, venial sins, and mortal sins are the cause of such evil (Yes, it really is a whole nother post’s worth!) It should suffice to put our minds to ease, though, that John of the Cross is not referring emphatically to those desires which we can scarcely avoid. Rather, he merely exhorts us to point our entire will to Christ and mortify all those voluntary imperfections and sins which present an obstacle to absolute happiness.

3. “What must I do, then? I understand that desiring willfully the things of the earth creates a darkness in my soul, and that to attain divine union, I must desire God with my whole will. But, what can I begin doing now to bring about such a change?” This, in particular, was a major question I had. I am a doer, and so when presented with a discourse on a particular problem, my single desire becomes action. It is very well to convince me that the desire to fulfill pleasures and imperfections is disorderly; good, I am convinced! Now what?

St. John of the Cross does not disappoint, however:

These counsels for the conquering of the desires, which now follow, albeit brief and few, I believe to be as profitable and efficaciousas they are concise; so that one who sincerely desires to practice them will need no others, but will find them all included in these.

Although these counsels themselves comprise a lifetime of lectures and exposition, I will describe them as briefly as possible:

1. First and foremost, we must imitate Christ’s life. We must meditate upon it daily, and seek in all the ways available to our state in life to emulate Him. As we said above, love produces similitude between lover and beloved. As a wife with cold benumbed hands will grasp her husbands and be warm, so we must cling to our Lord and “draw near to him” in order to receive the smoldering warmth of grace.

2. We must deny ourselves bodily pleasure. We find this same exhortation in St. Teresa’s Way of Perfection, that the body must be conquered by denial. This is a rather simple lesson, easily stated and hardly attainable without great travail: whatever sensual pleasure does not glorify God must be spurned. If a particular film does not point us “Godward,” we should deny ourselves the privilige of seeing it. If certain music does not glorify God, we should deny our ears such pleasure. And so forth.

3. We should “strive always to prefer, not that which is easiest [delectable, pleasureable, restful, consoling, great, lofty, etc.] but that which is most difficult [unpleasing, wearisome, disconsolate, least, lowest and despised].” In doing so, we can begin “to desire to enter into complete detachment and emptiness and poverty, with respect to everything that is in the world, for Christ’s sake.” That one is fairly self-explanatory.

There are a few lines left, but they repeat essentially what is from above (or if they don’t, they require more explanation than is fitting for this post). The whole essence is complete self-denial in imitation of Christ producing a detachment and repose in the soul, paving the way for God to fill what has become void.

I, for one, appreciate John of the Cross’s honesty in this matter. Although he admits that such a mortification must go “gradually,” and so we should slowly and prudently mortify our will as St. Frances de Sales exhorts us, the way is not easy. It is indeed narrow and stony, and we should have no doubts that our knees will turn black and bloody, our hands scraped and raw, from such a trek. But isn’t it an envigorating feeling to receive a call, not below our dignity, but beckoning us to answer the voice of Christ? Don’t we breathe deeply as the voice resounds in our hearts: “You are a child of God, not to be bound by such paltry cords! You were created to glorify the Almighty Lord of Lords, and He has chosen to bring you into his Holiest presence and to give you all the joys and gifts of His spirit. Why remain outside in your shabby and sullied rags, when he has presented you with the wedding garment of His own son? (Matt. 22:12)” And so, may we all respond to such a call and leave our wretched rags behind, so that “we all beholding the glory of the Lord with open face, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord” (2 Cor. 3:18).

In fine, I hope this post has helped illuminate at least a small part of St. John of the Cross’s work. I have no doubt that it helps me to explain it far more than it helps any of you to read it. But still, I hope it helps you all the same, and if it does, deo gratias!



Difficulties with Mortification
November 3, 2009, 11:16 am
Filed under: The Faith

I’m reading The Ascent of Mount Carmel now, by St. John of the Cross, and I must admit that I’m still in the darkness concerning the meaning of the “dark night of the sense” and the “mortification of desires.” Now, the Saint says that the soul must “pass through this dark night of mortification of the desires and denial of pleasures in all things…because all the affections which it has for creatures are pure darkness in the eyes of God” (23). Essentially, when man desires things for their own sake “apart from God,” he is in darkness while “Deus Lux Est” (1 John 1:5). For ease, I’ll enumerate his reasoning:

1. Two contraries cannot co-exist in one person — “What does light have in common with darkness,” St. Paul writes (2 Cor. 6:14). A soul wrapped in the darkness of creaturely affection cannot dwell with the Eternal Sun, the Divine Light Himself.

2. Love creates a likeness between the lover and the beloved — it births both and equality and, in a sense, a subjection. A soul whose affections are set upon creatures causes the soul to love and imitate creatures more, even bringing about subservience to the beloved (as lovers are always at the service of their beloved). If the beloved is the Almighty, then such a lover cannot help but imitate his Lord. If the beloved is a creature, then the lover is ultimately lower than the creature that he loves.

3. “All things of earth and heaven, compared with God, are nothing, as Jeremias says in these words: Aspexi terram, et ecce vacua erat, et nihil; et coelos, et non erat lux in eis (I saw the earth, and behold it was empty and nothing; and I saw the heavens, and there was no light in them).” In this way — that is, by way of comparison — all creation is nothing compared to God. Compared to the Infinite Being, Goodness, Beauty, Truth, creation is Nothing, Wicked, Hideous, and Foolish. This does not claim that creation is not good (as the Lord declared it so in Genesis), but that’s its goodness et. al. is a participation in the goodness of God: “For there is naught good, except God.” Thus, the soul who sets his heart on the creature apart from their creator (the source of the creatures goodness) loves darkness and nothingness, and becomes that which he loves.

4. “All delights and pleasures of the will in all the things of the world, in comparison with all those delights which are God, are supreme affliction, torment, and bitterness.” Again, the Infinitude of God’s Goodness renders all lesser pleasures and desires painful by comparison. A soul who loves these lower pleasures is “supremely poor and wretched in the sight of God, and for that reason will be unable to attain to that wealth and glory which is the state of transformation in God.”

5. Thus the Lord says in Proverbs 8:18-21: ”With me are riches and glory, glorious riches and justice. For my fruit is better than gold and the precious stone, and my blossoms than choice silver. I walk in the way of justice, in the midst of the paths of judgment, that I may enrich them that love me, and may fill their treasures.” The Lord thus beckons us to desist desiring lower pleasures, and by mortification of such paltry desires, we may be filled with abundant “treaures” such that we’ve never known.

Lord, how then can I take joy in the things which You have given to be enjoyed? Must we only “use this world, as if [we] used it not” (1 Cor. 7:13)? How do we partake of the pleasures of the earth in You? With thanksgiving? With pure detachment and contempt for the lower pleasures of the world? But does that contempt not become contempt of you, as an admirer spurns the painter by hating his painting?

 ”Guide of Wisdom,” teach me how to love you above all things, and all things in You! I know that I must be detached from all creatures — but I don’t know how to love except by remaining attached to those things I love, and I know that you do not call me to love my neighbor less, but more! Teach me, then, Divine Wisdom: Teach me, and I will hold my peace: and if I have been ignorant in any thing, instruct me (Job. 6:24).



The Humility of John the Baptist
November 2, 2009, 11:47 am
Filed under: De Sanctis | Tags: ,

When the Pharisees arrived at the fount to question John the Baptist (John 1:19-23), he demonstrated a tremendous humility. John is asked who he is, what he is — is he the Messiah? Elijah? Moses? Who?

It was made clear earlier in the Gospel of John that John the Baptist had no misconception about his relation to Our Lord: “This was he of whom I spoke: He that shall come after me, is preferred before me: because he was before me” (v.15). John knows that Christ is preexistent — knows that he is not worthy to touch his sandals.

But how exemplary was John’s humility in the face of his interrogators! Being presented with the chance to tell of his penances, his mighty role in the scheme of the Almighty — of what necessity he was! — He at first resists even identifying himself.

Is he the Messiah? No.

Is he Elijah returned? No.

Is he the Prophet, Moses, reincarnate? No.

And then silence.

The interrogators grow frustrated, and insist upon an answer for their masters. And John merely responds “I am the voice of one crying out in the wilderness, make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Isaias” (v.23).  John, then, is but an echo — he knows his own nothingness; knows that he can merely hope to reverberate a prophecy of our Lord; knows that our Lord is coming and hopes only to make His path straight; knows that his baptism is mere water, mere figure, and hopes for the baptism of fire.

John, as the Blessed Virgin Mary does, hides behind our Lord and His holy Prophets. He demonstrates the profound humility of the saints — their tireless latency in Christ. May the Lord grant us such humility, to forget our Honor and our Name and only answer our interlocutors: “We are unprofitable servants; we have done that which we ought to do” (Luke 17:10).